Skip to main content
Elastic Cloud

Elasticsearch 9.5.0 contains a query-correctness defect

Partial outage Lasted 6d 10h · started · Elastic Cloud's page

Level
confirmed
Worst impact
Partial outage
Down Index
33of 100

What to do

  • Check whether your product depends on Elastic Cloud. Check your stack

    Paste a package.json, lockfile, Terraform or a list of domains at down.guide/stack to see every provider you depend on.
  • Confirm your retries, queues and scheduled jobs caught up after the 6d 10h it lasted.

    Anything that failed between 2026-08-05 22:59 UTC and 2026-08-12 08:59 UTC may need a replay.
  • Subscribe to Elastic Cloud's feed to hear about the next one first. RSS feed

    https://down.guide/feed?provider=elastic-cloud works in Slack (/feed subscribe), Discord feed bots and any RSS reader.

Updates from Elastic Cloud 4

  1. identified

    Elasticsearch 9.5.0 contains a defect that can cause searches to return incorrect results for any index or data stream that disables indexing on a queried field . A query that excludes values using a must_not clause may fail to exclude them when the targeted field has doc values enabled but is not indexed for search. Affected searches can return documents that should have been excluded and report higher document counts than expected, and results may vary between runs of the same query. No error is raised, so affected queries appear to succeed. Dashboards, alerting rules, and anything else built on these searches may report inaccurate values. Both the query DSL and ES|QL are affected. Time series (TSDB) data streams are the most likely to be affected, because indexing is disabled by default for these fields. Columnar indices, currently in technical preview, are affected for the same reason. Any index or data stream that disables indexing on a queried field can be affected. This affects Elasticsearch 9.5.0 on Elastic Cloud Hosted, Elastic Cloud Enterprise, and self-managed deployments, as well as Elasticsearch Serverless projects. Elasticsearch 9.4.x and earlier are not affected. There is no impact to cluster availability, connectivity, or data ingestion. What you can do: - If you have not yet upgraded to 9.5.0, we recommend deferring the upgrade until a fixed version is available. - If you are already running 9.5.0, contact Elastic Support if you need help determining whether your searches are affected. We have identified the root cause, a fix is in progress, and we are preparing a patch release. We will provide a further update by 10:00 UTC August 6.

    provider

  2. identified

    Further investigation confirmed the impact of this issue was limited to boolean queries containing a must, filter, or should clause, along with a must_not clause on unindexed fields. Such queries can return false-positives returning documents that should have been excluded and report higher document counts than expected. We have identified the root cause, a fix is in progress, and we are preparing a patch release. We will provide a further update by 10:00 UTC August 6.

    provider

  3. identified

    A patch release containing the fix is in progress and it is expected to be available within the next week. Our recommendation to defer upgrading to 9.5.0 until 9.5.1 is available remains unchanged.

    provider

  4. resolved

    Elasticsearch 9.5.1 has been released and contains the fix for this issue. Customers running 9.5.0 should upgrade to 9.5.1. At this time we are considering this issue resolved and will be providing no further updates.

    provider

Reports count in aggregate; nothing about you is shown.

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error or send us a note. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about DWN-53a20665f4

Is Elastic Cloud still down?

No, this incident was resolved 2026-08-12 08:59 UTC. For Elastic Cloud's live state, see https://down.guide/elastic-cloud.

How long did it last?

6d 10h, from 2026-08-05 22:59 UTC to 2026-08-12 08:59 UTC, by the times Elastic Cloud posted.

What caused it?

Elastic Cloud hasn't published a root cause. If it does, it shows here.

Where does this come from?

Elastic Cloud's official status page, https://status.elastic.co, quoted verbatim. down.guide's own probes, reports and social counts are labeled as ours.